Browsing by Author "Khan, Nusrat"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Clinical learning environments across two different healthcare settings using the undergraduate clinical education environment measure
(2023) Benamer, Hani TS; Alsuwaidi, Laila; Khan, Nusrat; Lakshmanan, Jeyaseelan; Ho, Samuel B.; Kellett, Catherine; Alsheikh-Ali, Alawi; Stanley, Adrian G
Background: The clinical placements of our medical students are almost equally distributed across private and public sectors. This study aims to assess medical students’ perceptions of their Clinical learning Environment (CLE) across these two different healthcare settings, using the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM). Methods: 76 undergraduate medical students (Year 5 and 6), were invited to participate. Data were collected using an online UCEEM with additional questions related to demographics and case load exposure. The UCEEM consists of two overarching domains of experiential learning and social participation, with four subdomains of learning opportunities, preparedness, workplace interaction, and inclusion. Results: 38 questionnaires were received. Of 225 responses to the individual UCEEM items, 51 (22.6%) scored a mean of ≥4 (range 4-4.5, representing strong areas), 31 (13.7%) scored a mean of ≤3 (range 2.1-3, needing attention) and 143 (63.6%) scored a mean of 3.1–3.9 (areas that could be improved). The majority (63%) of the case load exposure responses scored a mean of ≥4 (range 4-4.5). Compared to the private sittings, there is a significant reduction in total UCEEM (p=0.008), preparedness for student entry (p=0.003), and overarching dimension of social participation (p=0.000) scores for the public sector. Similarly, both workplace interaction patterns and student inclusion and equal treatment scored significantly lower for the public sector (p=0.000 and p=0.011 respectively). Two out of three case load exposure items scored significantly higher for the public sector (p=0.000). Discussion: The students’ CLE perceptions were generally positive. The lower UCEEM ratings in the public sector items were related to student entry preparedness, workplace interactions, student inclusiveness and workforce equity of treatment. In contrast the students were exposed to more variety and larger number of patients in the public sector. These differences indicated some significantly different learning environments between the two sectors.
Insights into values and emotional wellbeing of medical students in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study
(2024-08) Alhashimi, Fatma Mustafa; Salim, Sara; Siddiqi, Warda; Jeyaseelan, Lakshmanan; Khan, Nusrat; Sultan, Meshal A
Abstract Objective: To describe the difference in values among medical students from a first-year student' and final year student' perspective. In addition, it is designed to report associations and trends between personal values and overall emotional states. Methods: This is an analytical cross-sectional study that involved disseminating an online survey via email to first and final year students at the College of Medicine in Mohammed Bin Rashid University (MBRU) in Dubai, United Arab Emirates in December of 2023. The survey encompassed queries on demographics, the Life Values Inventory (LVI) and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Results: The survey was completed by 84 students. About half of the participants were final year medical students (45/84; 53.6%) with the majority being females (70/84; 83.3%). Positive emotions were positively correlated to various life values, including belonging, scientific understanding, responsibility, and achievement (p < 0.05). When comparing academic years, the scores of the life value of Achievement showed a significant correlation (p = 0.04), with first-year students' mean (SD) of 12 (2) out of 15 compared to 11 (3) out of 15 for final-year students. Positive Emotions also exhibited a significant correlation (p = 0.006), with first-year students' mean (SD) 40 (5) out of 50 compared to 36 (7) out of 50 for final-year students. Conclusion: This study adds to medical education research by exploring values and emotions, shedding light on factors shaping students' professional identities. Understanding these dynamics can aid in supporting future healthcare providers and by extension the patients for whom they care.